Interesting Serial Numbers
TOP-10 of the same consecutive serial numbers| # | Serial | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *AAABBBBBBBB |  | * | 06.10.2011 |
| 2 | **AAAAABBCC* |  | 19.02.2011 | |
| 3 | *AAAAABB*A** | | * | 17.07.2011 |
| 4 | *ABCCBBBAAAA | | * | 22.11.2011 |
| 5 | *AAAAA****BB | | * | 24.11.2011 |
| 6 | *AAAAA**BB** | | * | 29.01.2012 |
| 7 | **AAAAA**A*A | | 19.01.2011 | |
| 8 | ***AAAABBBCC | | * | 15.02.2012 |
| 9 | *****A*AAAAA | | 16.08.2010 | |
| 10 | **AABBBBACCB |  | 10.02.2011 | |
12910 notes (64.8 % of all notes) had at least 2 same numbers in a row.
1527 notes (7.7 % of all notes) had at least 3 same numbers in a row.
145 notes (0.7 % of all notes) had at least 4 same numbers in a row.
11 notes (0.1 % of all notes) had at least 5 same numbers in a row.
1 note (0.0 % of all notes) had at least 6 same numbers in a row.
1 note (0.0 % of all notes) had at least 7 same numbers in a row.
1 note (0.0 % of all notes) had at least 8 same numbers in a row.
TOP-10 of recuring serial numbers
| # | Serial | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *AAABBBBBBBB | | * | 06.10.2011 |
| 2 | *ABBAACACBAA | | 15.09.2010 | |
| 3 | *ABBACBABCAB | | * | 14.09.2011 |
| 4 | *ABCCBBBAAAA | | * | 22.11.2011 |
| 5 | *ABBAACAAAAC | | * | 09.03.2012 |
| 6 | *ABBAACBCABB | | ** | 19.04.2012 |
| 7 | *AABACBB*BCB |  | 08.02.2010 | |
| 8 | *ABBCCBABDDA | | 23.02.2010 | |
| 9 | *AABBBACADCD | | 01.03.2010 | |
| 10 | *ABABAB*CBCB | | 04.04.2010 | |
1 note (0.0 % of all notes) consisted of 2 different numbers.
5 notes (0.0 % of all notes) consisted of 3 different numbers.
150 notes (0.8 % of all notes) consisted of 4 different numbers.
1439 notes (7.2 % of all notes) consisted of 5 different numbers.
5353 notes (26.9 % of all notes) consisted of 6 different numbers.
7703 notes (38.7 % of all notes) consisted of 7 different numbers.
4406 notes (22.1 % of all notes) consisted of 8 different numbers.
826 notes (4.1 % of all notes) consisted of 9 different numbers.
40 notes (0.2 % of all notes) consisted of 10 different numbers.
More silliness with numbers
7124 notes (35.8 % of all notes) didn't contain number 0
5708 notes (28.7 % of all notes) didn't contain number 1
4544 notes (22.8 % of all notes) didn't contain number 2
5677 notes (28.5 % of all notes) didn't contain number 3
5805 notes (29.1 % of all notes) didn't contain number 4
6497 notes (32.6 % of all notes) didn't contain number 5
6610 notes (33.2 % of all notes) didn't contain number 6
6642 notes (33.3 % of all notes) didn't contain number 7
6892 notes (34.6 % of all notes) didn't contain number 8
6798 notes (34.1 % of all notes) didn't contain number 9
*** Addition(s) within the last week
** Addition(s) within the last three months
* Addition(s) within the last year
Generated 2012-07-07 20:02:49 (by NIG version 1.84)